Blind and incremental or directed and disruptive? On the nature of novel variation in human cultural evolution

American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (1):7-20 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Many scholars have rejected cultural evolutionary theory on the grounds that cultural variation is directed and intentionally created, rather than incremental and blind with respect to function, as is the case for novel genetic variation in genetic evolution. Meanwhile, some cultural evolution researchers insist that cultural variation is blind and undirected, and the only directional force is selection of randomly-generated variants. Here I argue that neither of these positions are tenable. Cultural variation is directed in various ways. While this does not invalidate cultural evolution, more attention should be paid to the different sources of non-randomness in culturally evolving systems.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,898

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foresight in cultural evolution.Alex Mesoudi - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):243-255.
Is cultural evolution Lamarckian?Maria E. Kronfeldner - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):493-512.
Has mental time travel really affected human culture?Alex Mesoudi - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):326-327.
Updating evolutionary epistemology.Christophe Heintz - 2018 - In Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke & Ronald Soetaert (eds.), Perspectives on Science and Culture. pp. 195-222.
Function of infant-directed speech.Marilee Monnot - 1999 - Human Nature 10 (4):415-443.
The role of teleonomy in evolution.Grace A. De Laguna - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (2):117-131.
The Role of Teleonomy in Evolution.Grace A. De Laguna - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (2):117 - 131.


Added to PP

1 (#1,535,666)

6 months
1 (#479,521)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Selfish Gene. [REVIEW]Gunther S. Stent & Richard Dawkins - 1977 - Hastings Center Report 7 (6):33.
On the generality of the laws of learning.Martin E. Seligman - 1970 - Psychological Review 77 (5):406-418.
The Descent of Man.Charles Darwin - 1948 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 4 (2):216-216.

View all 13 references / Add more references