Leibnizian Aggregates Are Not Mind-Dependent Entities

Studia Leibnitiana 44 (2):193-211 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that, according to Leibniz's view of entia per aggregationem, there are (or, at any rate, there could be) aggregates that are entirely mind-independent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Entia successiva.Achille C. Varzi - 2003 - Rivista di Estetica 43 (1):139-158.
Michelangelo, Leibniz and the Serpentine Figure.Van Tuinen Sjoerd - 2011 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 5 (1):63-72.
One for Leibniz.Vernon Pratt - 1996 - Sorites 4:10-20.
Leibniz on the Reality of Body.Donald Paul Rutherford - 1988 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Kant's critique of the Leibnizian philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz.Anja Jauernig - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 41-63 (and 214-223 notes).
Are we "cell-aggregates"?Edmund Montgomery - 1882 - Mind 7 (25):100-107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-05

Downloads
19 (#775,535)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giovanni Merlo
University of Geneva

Citations of this work

Natural Objects.Joshua D. K. Brown - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (2):254-271.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references