‘How Early is Early?’ Or ‘How Late is Late?’: Thinking through some issues in early intervention

Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (8):845-859 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Early intervention comes in-between the lives of children, families and teachers. This article uses part of a report written by an educational psychologist about a little girl to question the nature of intervention through Rancière’s writings. As children and parents are seen as put into the position of inadequacy, they require such intervention, which in turn makes them more inadequate. The article goes on to highlight the numerous ‘givings’ involved in early intervention, through Derrida’s writing. However, such giving is questioned as creating expectations that receivers of the gift must fulfil, thus nullifying the gift. The conclusion suggests that starting from a perspective of equality and acknowledging the aporia involved could help the people in this scenario to take a different approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Russell: a guide for the perplexed.John Ongley & Rosalind Carey - 2013 - New York: Continuum. Edited by Rosalind Carey.
The journalist's role in bioethics.Albert Rosenfeld - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (2):108 – 129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-17

Downloads
21 (#715,461)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?