The Relational SNARC: Spatial Representation of Nonsymbolic Ratios

Cognitive Science 43 (8):e12778 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent research in numerical cognition has begun to systematically detail the ability of humans and nonhuman animals to perceive the magnitudes of nonsymbolic ratios. These relationally defined analogs to rational numbers offer new potential insights into the nature of human numerical processing. However, research into their similarities with and connections to symbolic numbers remains in its infancy. The current research aims to further explore these similarities by investigating whether the magnitudes of nonsymbolic ratios are associated with space just as symbolic numbers are. In two experiments, we found that responses were faster on the left for smaller nonsymbolic ratio magnitudes and faster on the right for larger nonsymbolic ratio magnitudes. These results further elucidate the nature of nonsymbolic ratio processing, extending the literature of spatial–numerical associations to nonsymbolic relative magnitudes. We discuss potential implications of these findings for theories of human magnitude processing in general and how this general processing relates to numerical processing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relational proof systems for spatial reasoning.Joanna Golińska-Pilarek & Ewa Orlowska - 2006 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 16 (3-4):409-431.
Spatial ontology and physical modalities.Hugh M. Lacey & Elizabeth Anderson - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (3):261 - 285.
Spatial semiosis and time.Leonid Tchertov - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (2):297-314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-29

Downloads
22 (#688,104)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?