The Quietist’s Gambit

Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 50 (149):3-30 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I develop a semantic theory of vagueness that is immune to worries regarding the use of precise mathematical tools. I call this view semantic quietism. This view has the advantage of being clearly compatible with the phenomenon of vagueness. The cost is that it cannot capture every robust semantic fact.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against quietist normative realism.Tristram McPherson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):223-240.
God’s silence.Elisa Paganini - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (2):287-298.
Models and theories I: The semantic view revisited.Chuang Liu - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):147 – 164.
Horgan on vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):273-285.
Some Remarks on Russell's Account of Vagueness.Alan Schwerin - 1999 - Contemporary Philosophy 3: 52 - 57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-15

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Understanding Truth.Scott Soames - 1998 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Précis of Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):921-928.

View all 33 references / Add more references