Based on the assumption that “philosophy, as the thought of the world, does not appear until reality has completed its formative process,” Georg Hegel compared it with the ancient symbol of wisdom: the owl of Minerva. This analogy is well known and has not caused many debates. Much less known is the comparison of philosophy with another bird, the rooster, proposed by Henry Thoreau. The main purpose of the article is to show that the latter analogy also has a deep meaning and can serve as a good addition to Hegel’s one. Both comparisons can co-exist as the symbols of two different ways of philosophizing. The comparison of philosophy with the owl is an accurate symbol of Hegel’s type of philosophizing: impersonal, academic, strictly theoretical, and quite conservative. At the same time, the comparison with the rooster is more in line with the type of philosophizing that Thoreau practiced: deeply personalized, extraacademic, practical, and future-oriented. It has been shown that Thoreau’s “morning-rooster” philosophy became the basis for many innovative ideas and practices, the relevance of which only grows over the time: the fight against racism, civil disobedience, wildlife conservation, animal protection, vegetarianism, and even downshifting. To clarify the specifics of this type of philosophizing, the author recontextualizes the famous episode from Plato’s “Phaedo”, in which Socrates not only sacrifices his own life by drinking a poisonous beverage but also asks to sacrifice a rooster. It has been shown that, to a certain level, Thoreau was like Socrates; however, his philosophy does not require such sacrifices. Thoreau’s philosophy is like the crowing of a cheerful rooster, which wakes up and notices the first rays of a new dawn, even in the twilight of the end of history.Manuscript received 10.08.2020.
Keywords Генрі Девід Торо  американський трансценденталізм  біографістика  біографія філософа  метафілософія  останні слова Сократа  сова Мінерви  Ґеорґ Вільгельм Фрідріх Геґель
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.18523/2617-1678.2020.6.3-13
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Hegel & J. Hoffmeister - 1960 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 150:569-569.
The Senses of Walden an Expanded Edition.Stanley Cavell - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.
A Cock for Asclepius.Glenn W. Most - 1993 - Classical Quarterly 43 (01):96-.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Чи потрібний нам геґель?Viktor Kozlovskyi - 2020 - Наукові Записки Наукма. Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 5:90-102.
Political Writings.Henry David Thoreau - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Henry David Thoreau. [REVIEW]B. S. C. G. - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (2):342-342.
Thoreau’s Importance for Philosophy.Whitley Kaufman - 2014 - The Pluralist 9 (1):114-118.
Review of The Yogi of Walden: Henry David Thoreau. [REVIEW]Subhasis Chattopadhyay - 2011 - Prabuddha Bharata or Awakened India 116 (7):515-16.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,129,652 of 2,499,433 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,166 of 2,499,433 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes