Stimulus discriminability and conditioning-history effects on response summation

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (4):307-310 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03334718

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On stimulus and response discriminability.Harry P. Bahrick & Merrill Noble - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (6):449.
Influence of response discriminability on stimulus discriminability.J. F. Richard - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):30.
Stimulus discriminability and S-R compatibility: Evidence for independent effects in choice reaction time.Irving Biederman & Robert Kaplan - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):434.
Reaction time as a function of perceptual bias, response bias, and stimulus discriminability.Howard B. Orenstein - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):38.
Discriminative conditioning. II. Effects of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus upon a subsequently established operant response. [REVIEW]William K. Estes - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (2):173.
S-R compatability, response discriminability, and response codes in choice reaction time.Harvey G. Shulman & Alan McConkie - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):375.
Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response to CS compounds: Effects of prior single-stimulus conditioning.Bernard G. Schreurs & I. Gormezano - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 19 (6):365-368.
The effects of stimulus duration and frequency of daily preconditioning stimulus exposures on latent inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.Margaret E. Clarke & Ralph B. Hupka - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (4):225-228.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):35.
Studies of response generalization in conditioning. I. Stimulus generalization during response generalization.D. D. Wickens - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (3):221.
Discriminability and stimulus generalization.Norman Guttman & Harry I. Kalish - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (1):79.
The magnitude of binocular summation as a function of the method of stimulus presentation.George Collier & Philip Kubzansky - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (4):355.
Failures to obtain mediated generalization effects in eyelid conditioning.G. Robert Grice, Howard J. Simmons & John J. Hunter - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):485.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of stimulus similarity and strength of response to the CS.Malcolm D. Gynther - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (6):408.
Effect of instructions on responsiveness to the CS and to the UCS in GSR conditioning.Brian Harvey & Delos D. Wickens - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (1):137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
3 (#1,644,941)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conditioned Reflexes.I. P. Pavlov - 1927 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (4):560-560.
Reward versus nonreward in simultaneous discrimination.R. Allen Gardner & W. B. Coate - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (6):579.

Add more references