Knowing the Knowing. Non-dual Meditative Practice From an Enactive Perspective

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Within a variety of contemplative traditions, non-dual-oriented practices were developed to evoke an experiential shift into a mode of experiencing in which the cognitive structures of self-other and subject–object subside. These practices serve to de-reify the enactment of an observing witness which is usually experienced as separate from the objects of awareness. While several contemplative traditions, such as Zen, Mahāmudrā, Dzogchen, and Advaita Vedanta emphasize the importance of such a non-dual insight for the cultivation of genuine wellbeing, only very few attempts in contemplative science have turned toward the study of non-dual-oriented practices. This article starts from a recently developed theoretical cognitive science framework that models the requirements of a temporary experiential shift into a mode of experiencing free from cognitive subject–object structure. This model inspired by the enactive approach contributes theoretically grounded hypotheses for the much-needed rigorous study of non-dual practices and non-dual experiences. To do so, three steps are taken: first, common elements of non-dual-oriented practices are outlined. Second, the main ideas of enactive cognitive science are presented including a principled theoretical model of what is required for a shift to a pure non-dual experience, that is, an experiential mode that is unbound by subject–object duality. Third, this synthesized theoretical model of the requirements for the recognition of the non-dual is then compared with a specific non-dual style of meditation practice, namely, Mahāmudrā practice from Tibetan Buddhism. This third step represents a heuristic for evaluating the external coherence of the presented model. With this, the aim is to point toward a principled enactive view of non-dual meditative practice. In drawing the implications of the presented model, this article ends with an outlook toward next steps for further developing a research agenda that may fully address the concrete elements of non-dual practices.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowing-that, Knowing-how, or Knowing-to?Yong Huang - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Research 42:65-94.
An Analysis of Knowing. [REVIEW]F. T. R. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (2):324-324.
The Knowing Body: Eco-Paganism as an Embodying Practice.Adrian Harris - 2016 - In De Lucia and Sullivan Thomas-Pellicer (ed.), Contributions to Law, Philosophy and Ecology: Exploring Re-Embodiments. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 139 - 158.
Knowing‐Wh and Embedded Questions.Ted Parent - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):81-95.
Knowing-that, knowing-how, and knowing philosophically.Stephen Hetherington - 2008 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):307-324.
Undoing theory/practice dualism: Joint action and knowing from within.Darryl B. Hill & Martin E. Morf - 2000 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):208-224.
Two Senses of "Knowing".Richard Schmitt - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (4):657 - 677.
Loving and knowing: reflections for an engaged epistemology.Hanne De Jaegher - 2019 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (5):847-870.
Knowing How, What and That.Nathan Brett - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):293 - 300.
What our Rylean Ancestors Knew: More on Knowing How and Knowing That.Joseph Shieber - 2003 - Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 11:328-330.
Knowing-how and Dispositions.Tomoyuki Murase - 2021 - Tetsugaku 72:164-175.
Knowing How, Knowing That, Knowing Technology.Per Norström - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (4):553-565.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-20

Downloads
4 (#1,426,245)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?