Jewish Philosophy as Minority Philosophy

In Yitzhak Melamed & Paul Franks (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Philosophy. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jewish philosophy has seen better days. It has been quite a while since the discipline of Jewish philosophy enjoyed the respect of the wider philosophical community, and an obvious question is what are the reasons for this state of things? Providing a detailed and thorough answer to this question is beyond the scope of the current chapter. Still, I would like to contribute here a few ideas that might shed some light on the current predicament and its causes. Such an attempt is timely because the current moment in the development of Anglo-American philosophy is impregnated with a promise – which I hope is sincere – to turn the study of philosophy and the history of philosophy into an inclusive and genuinely universal field of inquiry, shared equally by all human beings, rather than an imposition of the prevalent beliefs of white Christian European males. A study of philosophy that is genuinely ecumenical could profit enormously from the encounter and dialogue with the philosophical thinking of minority cultures, since it is precisely this encounter with the philosophical thought of minority cultures that could expose the potentially numerous blind spots of the majority. If anything can heal Western philosophy from the prejudice that what one takes to be natural must be equally judged so by all rational human beings, it is only the encounter with non-Christian, or non-Western, philosophical thinking that could refute its illusory pretense of universality. Obviously, the real issue at stake is the sincerity of the attempt to understand foreign cultures and their philosophical thinking in their own terms. An identity politics that is merely interested in extending fig leaves would be far worse than the old, conservative state of things, insofar as the new and “inclusive” appearance would only provide the majority culture with a sense of self-satisfaction that would allow it to stick to its old and obstinate prejudicial practices. My aims in the current chapter are pretty modest and concrete. In the first two parts of the chapter, I will attempt to shed light on two blind spots related to perceptions of Jewish philosophy, from without and from within, respectively. These two parts will thus inquire into the nature of Jewish philosophy as minority philosophy. In the third and final part, I will turn to the rudimentary requirements of Jewish philosophy qua philosophy. In this part, I will suggest some fundamental desiderata which might – I hope – help the field flourish and achieve the recognition it deserves. Here too, my claims would be quite plain, as most of the desired characteristics I would argue for are pretty trivial, yet unfortunately still mostly lacking.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For the love of God and people: a philosophy of Jewish law.Elliot N. Dorff - 2007 - Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.
What is Jewish in Jewish philosophy?Karl-Johan Illman - 2000 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 21 (1-2):65-70.
Paradigms in Jewish Philosophy.Raphael Jospe - 1997 - Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press.
Studies in medieval Jewish history and literature.Isadore Twersky (ed.) - 1979 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Jewish Philosophers and Jewish Philosophy.Emil L. Fackenheim - 1996 - Bloomington: Ind. : Indiana University Press.
The Heteronomy of Modern Jewish Philosophy.Michael Zank - 2012 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 20 (1):99-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-10

Downloads
116 (#149,938)

6 months
48 (#83,516)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yitzhak Melamed
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references