Exploring the Principle of Subsidiarity in Organisational Forms

Journal of Business Ethics 60 (3):293-305 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper starts with a case study of a medium-sized company in which a strong and successful change in the organisational form and job design took place. A bureaucratic organisation with highly-specialised jobs was converted into a new organisation in which employees became much more autonomous in managing their own work. This not only entailed new techniques and managerial systems but also a new anthropological vision. Bureaucratic rules were reduced, but not eliminated completely, and management became less authoritarian. Employees could therefore apply greater entrepreneurial spirit, developing their talents in pursuit of the company’s common goals. It is argued that this new organisational form is ethically superior to the old, and reflects the basic requirements of the principle of subsidiarity. The ethical principle of subsidiarity holds that a larger and higher-ranking body should not exercise functions which could be efficiently carried out by a smaller and lesser body; rather the former should support the latter by aiding it in the coordination of its activities with those of the greater community. While the principle has usually been applied in a political context, this paper explores the principle as a moral base for organisational forms within business organisations. Finally, the principle of subsidiarity is analysed in the context of business organisations and proposed as an ethical guideline for organisational forms. This would help to mitigate the effects of those bureaucracies in which individuals, with their dignity, freedom, diversity and capacity for undertaking business activities with entrepreneurial spirit, are often not fully appreciated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotelian Groundings of the Social Principle of Subsidiarity.Justin M. Anderson - 2014 - International Philosophical Quarterly 54 (3):333-351.
Subsidiarity and Community in Europe.Yves Soudan - 1998 - Ethical Perspectives 5 (3):177-187.
The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Church.Andrew Murray - 1995 - The Australasian Catholic Record 72:163-172.
Autonomy, Subsidiarity and the Religious University.John C. Fusco - 2003 - Dissertation, Saint Louis University
How not to criticize the precautionary principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#226,531)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Postmodern ethics.Zygmunt Bauman - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
Moral mazes: the world of corporate managers.Robert Jackall - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Social Theory and Social Structure.Lawrence Haworth - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):345-346.
Politics.H. Aristotle & Rackham - 1944 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by H. Rackham.

View all 6 references / Add more references