Autonomy and Neuroscience

In L. Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I opened this chapter with the question whether neuroscientific experiments have shown that there are no autonomous human beings. In my opinion, the answer is no. I have not argued for that answer here, of course. Doing so is much too grand a project for a single chapter. Instead, I attacked one line of argument for the claim that neuroscientific experiments have shown that human autonomy is an illusion and I discussed an important difficulty in moving from an alleged finding about proximal decisions in a common experimental setting to an autonomy-threatening thesis about all decisions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomous psychology: What it should and should not entail.William P. Bechtel - 1984 - Philosophy of Science Association 1984:43 - 55.
Autonomy and multiple realization.Robert C. Richardson - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):526-536.
Autonomy, consent and the law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Routledge-Cavendish.
Two Types of Autonomy.J. S. Swindell Blumenthal-Barby - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics-Neuroscience 9 (1):52-53.
The trouble with externalist compatibilist autonomy.Stefaan E. Cuypers - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (2):171-196.
Autonomy, self-control and weakness of will.Alfred R. Mele - 2001 - In Robert Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-13

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alfred Mele
Florida State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references