Hoe dik is het ik?

Abstract

How fat is the I? Neuroscience and the elusive selfThis article explores the concept of self in relation to neuroscience. Four options are discussed on the basis of a key representative. The first is the dualist position where the non-material self controls its brain, as defended by Eccles. Next comes the option of the self as a relatively or completely powerless entity within the brain, as exemplified by Libet’s experiments on free will. The third option is the identity of self and brain, as argued by Dennett. The last option is the identity of self and body, and here Gallagher is the representative. It is shown that no monist position is completely consistently defended. In the conclusion, four factors are identified that hinder a simple and consistent monist conceptualisation of the self in the context of neuroscience.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-24

Downloads
6 (#1,141,920)

6 months
1 (#386,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Monica Meijsing
Tilburg University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Identism Without Objective Qualia: Commentary on Crooks.James W. Kalat - 2002 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 23 (3):233-238.
Requiem for the Identity Theory.J. R. Smythies - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):311-29.
Conscious Intention and Brain Activity.Patrick Haggard & Benjamin W. Libet - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (11):47-63.
There Is No Free Won't: The Role Definitions Play.L. Asma - 2017 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 (5-6):8-23.