Are we paraconsistent? on the luca-penrose argument and the computational theory of mind

Auslegung 27 (1):23-30 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.17161/auslegung.v27i1.12649

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Are we paraconsistent? On the Lucas-Penrose argument and the computational theory of mind.Jason L. Megill - 2004 - Auslegung 27 (1):23-30.
Are Turing Machines Platonists? Inferentialism and the Computational Theory of Mind.Jon Cogburn & Jason Megil - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (3):423-439.
The Frame Problem, Gödelian Incompleteness, and the Lucas-Penrose Argument: A Structural Analysis of Arguments About Limits of AI, and Its Physical and Metaphysical Consequences.Yoshihiro Maruyama - 2017 - In Vincent C. Müller (ed.), Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence 2017. Berlin: Springer.
Remarks on Penrose’s “New Argument”.Per Lindström - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):231-237.
A refutation of Penrose's Godelian case against artificial intelligence.Selmer Bringsjord - 2000
Mechanism, truth, and Penrose's new argument.Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (1):19-42.
Penrose's Gödelian Argument A Review of Shadows of the Mind by Roger Penrose. [REVIEW]S. Feferman - 1995 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 2:21-32.
On the Anti-Mechanist Arguments Based on Gödel’s Theorem.Stanisław Krajewski - 2020 - Studia Semiotyczne 34 (1):9-56.
Minds, Machines, And Mathematics A Review of Shadows of the Mind by Roger Penrose. [REVIEW]David J. Chalmers - 1995 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 2:11-20.
On the Question of Whether the Mind Can Be Mechanized, II: Penrose’s New Argument.Peter Koellner - 2018 - Journal of Philosophy 115 (9):453-484.
Computational Theory of Mind.Marcin Milkowski - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Yesterday’s Algorithm: Penrose and the Gödel Argument.William Seager - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (9):265-273.
On Some Properties of Humanly Known and Humanly Knowable Mathematics.Jason L. Megill, Tim Melvin & Alex Beal - 2014 - Axiomathes 24 (1):81-88.
On a “most telling” argument for paraconsistent logic.Michaelis Michael - 2016 - Synthese 193 (10).
Searle's and Penrose's Noncomputational Frameworks for Naturalizing the Mind.Napoleon M. Mabaquiao - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-19

Downloads
7 (#1,310,999)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Megill
Bentley College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.
Paraconsistent logic.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Minds, Machines and Gödel.J. R. Lucas - 1961 - Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
Brains and behavior.Hilary Putnam - 1963 - In Ronald J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy: Second Series. Blackwell.

View all 8 references / Add more references