Are we paraconsistent? on the luca-penrose argument and the computational theory of mind

Auslegung 27 (1):23-30 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Remarks on Penrose’s “New Argument”.Per Lindström - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):231-237.
Mechanism, truth, and Penrose's new argument.Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (1):19-42.
Penrose's Gödelian Argument A Review of Shadows of the Mind by Roger Penrose. [REVIEW]S. Feferman - 1995 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 2:21-32.
Minds, Machines, And Mathematics A Review of Shadows of the Mind by Roger Penrose. [REVIEW]David J. Chalmers - 1995 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 2:11-20.
Computational Theory of Mind.Marcin Milkowski - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Yesterday’s Algorithm: Penrose and the Gödel Argument.William Seager - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (9):265-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-19

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Megill
Bentley College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.
Paraconsistent logic.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Minds, Machines and Gödel.J. R. Lucas - 1961 - Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
Brains and behavior.Hilary Putnam - 1963 - In Ronald J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy: Second Series. Blackwell.

View all 8 references / Add more references