Pluralism, exclusivism, and the theoretical virtues

Religious Studies 42 (2):193-206 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that John Hick's commitment to the moral principle of altruism undermines his pluralistic claim that all of the major world religions are equally efficacious from a soteriological perspective. This argument is placed in a context of a discussion evaluating the theoretical virtues of various hypotheses about religious diversity. (Published Online April 7 2006).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theorizing religious diversity in a multicultural world.Victoria S. Harrison - 2007 - ICFAI Journal of History and Culture 1 (1):25-43.
Religious pluralism assessed.Avi Sagi - 1999 - Sophia 38 (2):93-115.
A Pragmatic Defense of Religious Exclusivism.Girard Brenneman - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:13-18.
Defending religious pluralism for religious education.Andrew Davis - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (3):189 - 202.
The Impossibility of a Pluralist View of Religions.Gavin D'Costa - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):223 - 232.
The philosophical challenge of religious diversity.Philip L. Quinn & Kevin Meeker (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
106 (#159,765)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Meeker
University of South Alabama

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references