Neural models that convince: Model hierarchies and other strategies to bridge the gap between behavior and the brain

Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):749 – 772 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Computational modeling of the brain holds great promise as a bridge from brain to behavior. To fulfill this promise, however, it is not enough for models to be 'biologically plausible': models must be structurally accurate. Here, we analyze what this entails for so-called psychobiological models, models that address behavior as well as brain function in some detail. Structural accuracy may be supported by (1) a model's a priori plausibility, which comes from a reliance on evidence-based assumptions, (2) fitting existing data, and (3) the derivation of new predictions. All three sources of support require modelers to be explicit about the ontology of the model, and require the existence of data constraining the modeling. For situations in which such data are only sparsely available, we suggest a new approach. If several models are constructed that together form a hierarchy of models, higher-level models can be constrained by lower-level models, and low-level models can be constrained by behavioral features of the higher-level models. Modeling the same substrate at different levels of representation, as proposed here, thus has benefits that exceed the merits of each model in the hierarchy on its own.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Robots aren't the only physical models.Peter E. Midford - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1069-1070.
On levels of cognitive modeling.Ron Sun, Andrew Coward & Michael J. Zenzen - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (5):613-637.
Is there more to “model” than “muddle”?Matthias Scheutz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1076-1077.
The dynamical model is a perceptron.Bruce Bridgeman - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):631-632.
The nature and function of models.Ronald N. Giere - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1060-1060.
Dimensionality and explanatory power of reading models.Douglas Hanes & Gin McCollum - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):486-487.
Sticking to the manifesto.Mike Page - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):496-505.
Bottoms-up! A refreshing change in models.Charles T. Snowdon - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):266-267.


Added to PP

64 (#243,546)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Noam Chomsky - 1965 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.

View all 33 references / Add more references