Who Decides How History Should Be Studied? [Book Review]

Chronicle of Higher Education 69 (2):1-1 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The claim that historians “write from a present-day perspective” does not entail that the past only matters when interpreted by categories of social justice. The past is a set of amorphous events and people, including their actions and motives. So, historians are free to explore various aspects of it to offer meaningful and compelling interpretations without necessarily privileging one category. The past is richer than we can humanely understand. Hence, it is important that new generations of scholars revise it from different angles and without ideological restrictions.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Causal Presentism.Veli Virmajoki - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):68-96.
Moral Relativism: A Reader.Paul K. Moser (ed.) - 2000 - New York, NY: Oup Usa.
Two kinds of moral relativism.John J. Tilley - 1995 - Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):187-192.
Relativism.Maria Baghramian - 2004 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Annalisa Coliva.
Relativism (New Problems of Philosophy).Maria Baghramian & Annalisa Coliva - 2004 - New York, NY, USA: Routledge. Edited by Annalisa Coliva.
Moral Relativism: Aspects and Principles.Mohammad Ali Shomali - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 11 (42):56-77.
Modern Moral Relativism.Christian Miller - 2016 - In Todd Shackelford & Viviana Weekes-Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer.
Hayden White’s Misreading of Nietzsche’s Meta-History.Anthony K. Jensen - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Research 40:337-356.
Presentism and the Problem of Cross-Time Relations.Rafael De Clercq - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):386 - 402.
Selection, presentism, and pluralist history.Hakob Barseghyan - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92 (C):60-70.
The crisis of representations.Lada Shipovalova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):171-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-31

Downloads
178 (#106,909)

6 months
58 (#73,829)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vicente Medina
Seton Hall University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references