Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought

Routledge (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Originally published in 1969. This book explains what is wrong with the traditional methodology of "inductive" reasoning and shows that the alternative scheme of reasoning associated with Whewell, Pierce and Popper can give the scientist a useful insight into the way he thinks

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

O indukcji niezupełnej w matematyce.Lech Gruszecki - 2005 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 53 (2):47-72.
Discoverers' induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):580-604.
How (Not) to Justify Induction.Dale Jacquette - 2011 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):1-18.
Karl Popper's Theory of the Empirical Basis.Victor Patrick Rodych - 1988 - Dissertation, York University (Canada)
Scientific reasoning and the summum bonum.W. E. Schlaretzki - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (1):48-57.
Induction in aristotle's system of scientific knowledge.Dušan Galik - 2006 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 13 (4):495-505.
A Pessimistic Induction against Scientific Antirealism.Seungbae Park - 2014 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 21 (1):3-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-25

Downloads
1 (#1,866,476)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?