Constraints and Preferences in Inductive Learning: An Experimental Study of Human and Machine Performance

Cognitive Science 11 (3):299-339 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper examines constraints and preferences employed by people in learning decision rules from preclassified examples. Results from four experiments with human subjects were analyzed and compared with artificial intelligence (AI) inductive learning programs. The results showed the people's rule inductions tended to emphasize category validity (probability of some property, given a category) more than cue validity (probability that an entity is a member of a category given that it has some property) to a greater extent than did the AI programs. Although the relative proportions of different rule types (e.g., conjunctive vs. disjunctive) changed across experiments, a single process model provided a good account of the data from each study. These observations are used to argue for describing constraints in terms of processes embodied in models rather than in terms of products or outputs. Thus AI induction programs become candidate psychological process models and results from inductive learning experiments can suggest new algorithms. More generally, the results show that human inductive generalizations tend toward greater specificity than would be expected if conceptual simplicity were the key constraint on inductions. This bias toward specificity may be due to the fact that this criterion both maximizes inferences that may be drawn from category membership and protects rule induction systems from developing over‐generalizations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inductive learning by machines.Stuart Russell - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (October):37-64.
Human Semi-Supervised Learning.Bryan R. Gibson, Timothy T. Rogers & Xiaojin Zhu - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):132-172.
Philosophy and machine learning.Paul Thagard - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):261-76.
The complexity of learning SUBSEQ(A).Stephen Fenner, William Gasarch & Brian Postow - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (3):939-975.
Varieties of Justification in Machine Learning.David Corfield - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (2):291-301.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
15 (#809,553)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?