A Combined Argument: Beyond Wallerstein?

Historical Materialism 26 (3):125-142 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

InHow the West Came to Rule, Alexander Anievas and Kerem Nişancıoğlu offer an alternative to both Political Marxism and world-systems analysis by going beyond the nation-state as the unit of analysis in the former and the marginalisation of articulation and combination between modes of production in the latter. Their account also gives more room to non-European actors neglected in other interpretations of the rise of the West. However, I argue that their argument is much closer toWSAand that their critique of Wallerstein regarding Eurocentrism, the origins of capitalism and the role of wage labour in the capitalist world-system is problematic. Furthermore, Anievas and Nişancıoğlu do not offer a sufficiently rigorous definition of combination, leading to an overextension of the concept.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,439

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Frontiers of Uneven and Combined Development.Neil Davidson - 2018 - Historical Materialism 26 (3):52-78.
Globalising the History of Capital: Ways Forward.Jairus Banaji - 2018 - Historical Materialism 26 (3):143-166.
My Capitalism Is Bigger than Yours!Maïa Pal - 2018 - Historical Materialism 26 (3):99-124.
The space of the world : beyond state-centrism?Neil Brenner - 2011 - In David Palumbo-Liu, Bruce Robbins & Nirvana Tanoukhi (eds.), Immanuel Wallerstein and the problem of the world: system, scale, culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-01

Downloads
35 (#452,619)

6 months
5 (#878,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?