Toleration and neutrality: Incompatible ideals?

Res Publica 7 (3):293-313 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Toleration and neutrality are not always distinguished. When they are, they are often offered as two complementary solutions for the problem of achieving political unity and a degree of mutual acceptance within a pluralist liberal polity. The essay shows the concepts to be fundamentally distinct, and then argues that instead of being mutually supporting, they are mutually exclusive. Neutralist liberals, it is argued, must give up toleration in favour of the virtue of neutrality on the part of citizens.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On being tolerated.Leslie Green - 2008 - In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Toleration as sedition.Glen Newey - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):363-384.
Democracy and toleration.Maurizio Passerin D'Entrèves - 2001 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (3):49-66.
Why Liberal Neutralists Should Accept Educational Neutrality.Matt Sensat Waldren - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):71-83.
What toleration is.Andrew Jason Cohen - 2004 - Ethics 115 (1):68-95.
The Impossibility of Political Neutrality.Noriaki Iwasa - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):147-155.
Introduction: Toleration re-examined.Derek Edyvane & Matt Matravers - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):281-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
75 (#216,283)

6 months
16 (#148,627)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saladin Meckled-Garcia
University College London

References found in this work

A theory of freedom of expression.Thomas Scanlon - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):204-226.

Add more references