Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (1):70-89 (2018)

Saladin Meckled-Garcia
University College London
The agency objection to applying distributive justice globally is that principles of distributive justice need to apply to the behaviour of a special kind of institutional agent of distributive justice because of the special powers of that agent. No such agent exists capable of configuring cooperative arrangements between all persons globally, and so distributive justice does not apply globally. One response to institutional views of this kind is that they do not rule out Natural Duties of Justice that fall on all of us to bring about institutional agencies capable of global distributive justice. In this article I argue that this move presupposes a particular, teleological, conception of justice whilst institutional accounts most plausibly rest on a non-teleological one. I provide an argument for favouring the non-teleological conception. I also show why alternative ways of arguing for global Natural Duties of Justice do not get around this controversy. The debate is at the level of presuppositions about justice, and relying on a partisan conception is question begging.
Keywords Globla justice  Natural duties  imperfect duties  Agency  responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12264
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review Article: International Distributive Justice.Simon Caney - 2001 - Political Studies 49 (5):974-997.
How Association Matters for Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):161-186.
How Association Matters for Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):161-186.
How Association Matters for Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2014 - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Associative Duties and Global Justice.Jonathan Seglow - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):54-73.
What's Special About the State?Helena de Bres - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (2):140-160.
Kant on International Distributive Justice.Sylvie Loriaux - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):281 – 301.
Kantian Ethics and Global Justice.Kok-Chor Tan - 1997 - Social Theory and Practice 23 (1):53-73.
Liberal Internationalism and Global Social Justice.Kostas Koukouzelis - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):97-108.
Comentarios Sobre la Concepcion de la Justicia Global de Pogge.Pablo Gilabert - 2007 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 33 (2):205-222.
Gender.Anca Gheaus - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 389-414.
Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge.Pablo Gilabert - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):193-216.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #766,013 of 2,499,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,516 of 2,499,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes