Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):73-87 (2013)

Saladin Meckled-Garcia
University College London
Either a person's claim to subsistence goods is held against institutions equipped to distribute social benefits and burdens fairly or it is made regardless of such a social scheme. If the former, then one's claim is not best understood as based on principles setting out a subsistence goods entitlement, but rather on principles of equitable social distribution — a fair share. If, however, the claim is not against a given social scheme, no plausible principle exists defining what counts as a reasonable burden for any of the available agents to secure subsistence. No justifiable principle exists implying generalised perfect duties any agent could clearly follow or clearly breach that secure subsistence conditions for others. At best we can justify rescue duties under very specific conditions, or general but imperfect duties to improve arrangements. Neither of these obviously correlates with human rights standards. Attempts in the literature to overcome the dilemma by claiming basic rights can correlate with imperfect duties or can generate duties to work towards institutions that ‘perfect’ our imperfect duties, are faulty. I then show how the dilemma can be avoided by accounts of human rights focusing on minimum respectful treatment rather than goods or interests
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12005
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,811
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Claims and Duties of Socioeconomic Human Rights.Stephanie Collins - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (265):701-722.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Subsistence Needs, Human Rights, and Imperfect Duties.Simon Hope - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):88-100.
The Imperfect Nature of Corporate Responsibilities to Stakeholders.David Lea - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):201-217.
The Human Right to Subsistence.Charles Jones - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):57-72.
Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge.Pablo Gilabert - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):193-216.
Acts, Perfect Duties, and Imperfect Duties.Michael Stocker - 1967 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (3):507 - 517.
The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative?Pablo Gilabert - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537-550.
Human Rights and Positive Corporate Duties: The Importance of Corporate–State Interaction.Ivar Kolstad - 2012 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 21 (3):276-285.


Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #198,519 of 2,463,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #179,109 of 2,463,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes