Die Grundsätzliche Beurteilung der Religionsgeschichte durch Schleiermacher [Book Review]
Review of Metaphysics 23 (2):360-360 (1969)
Abstract
One of the most interesting and difficult tasks of contemporary theological reflection is the elaboration of a verifiable theology. The subject is as old as theology itself, and the contemporaries of Schleiermacher, like Hegel and Schelling, devoted immense industry and ingenuity to a speculative study of the history of religions. Yet the idealist's philosophical approach could not satisfy Schleiermacher whose very point of departure is the autonomous category of the religious. His peculiar approach to the different positive religions, their necessity as well as their facticity, is the central theme of Welker's book. In a way, we are given a restatement of Schleiermacher's fundamental views on religion and religions. The treatment of the history of religion is only a corollary of these more general issues. The book is concluded with a rich and interesting chapter comparing Schleiermacher with Rudolph Otto.--M. J. V.ISBN(s)
0034-6632
My notes
Similar books and articles
Pericles in Attic Comedy Joachim Schwarze: Die Beurteilung des Perikles durch die attische Komödie und ihre historische und historiographische Bedeutung (Zetemata, 51). Pp. viii+219. Munich: Beck, 1971. Paper, DM.35. [REVIEW]K. J. Dover - 1975 - The Classical Review 25 (01):90-91.
De betekenis von Schleiermacher voor vandaag. De jubileumbundel over Schleiermacher van de Archivio di filosofia Schleiermacher aujourd'hui. Sur le volume consacré à Schleiermacher par la revue Archivio di Filosofia. [REVIEW]N. Schreurs - 1987 - Bijdragen 48 (1):67-74.
Hermes Trismegistus G. Löhr: Verherrlichung Gottes durch Philosophie. Der Hermetische Traktat II im Rahmen der antiken Philosophie- und Religionsgeschichte . Pp. x + 402. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1997. Cased, DM 228. ISBN: 3-16-146616-. [REVIEW]Matthew P. J. Dillon - 1999 - The Classical Review 49 (01):39-.
Schleiermacher, Realism, and Epistemic Modesty: A Reply to my Critics.Jacqueline Mariña - 2010 - In Brent Sockness & Wilhelm Gräb (eds.), Schleiermacher, the Study of Religion, and the Future of Theology. de Gruyter.
On 'nothing to distinguish' Schleiermacher and Otto: reply to Smith.Andrew Dole - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):449-468.
Schleiermacher's Soliloquies: An English Translation of the Monologen with a Critical Introduction and Appendix.Friedrich Schleiermacher - 1926 - Hyperion Press.
Schleiermacher on the Philosopher’s Stone: the Shaping of Schleiermacher’s Early Ethics by the Kantian Legacy.Jacqueline Mariña - 1999 - Journal of Religion 79 (2):193-215.
Feeling of absolute dependence or absolute feeling of dependence? (What Schleiermacher really said and why it matters).Georg Behrens - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (4):471-481.
Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher's Theological Ethics.James M. Brandt - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):51 - 72.
Introduction.Jacqueline Marina - 2005 - In Jacqueline Mariña (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-03-18
Downloads
14 (#733,501)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2012-03-18
Downloads
14 (#733,501)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads