Determining the Indeterminate: A Critical Assessment of the Thomistic Argument for Extensionless Prime Matter and Proposal of Various Theories of Extended Prime Matter

Analítica 4 (1):71-84 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reconciling the permanence of existence with the existence of change is a long-standing metaphysical puzzle. Some, following Aristotle, resolve this tension by positing ‘prime matter’, a bedrock which grounds all change. Saint Thomas Aquinas argued prime matter had to be purely potential, thus completely indeterminate and extensionless. This article charitably reconstructs and critically assesses Aquinas’ view, arguing it is far too restrictive. Prime matter need only be maximally potential and determinable, allowing it to take on certain determinate properties. I argue extension is an obvious candidate property and propose five theories positing extended prime matter: (1) a subtle revision of Aquinas' own view, (2) a hylomorphic approach which attributes to prime matter an ‘elastic’ extension, (3) a minimally/infinitesimally extended prime matter inspired by ancient atomism and late-renaissance/early-modern corpuscularianism, (4) a maximally/infinitely extended prime matter influenced by Advaita Vedanta, and (5) a pluralist approach reminiscent of Aristotle's elements. Crucially, by allowing prime matter a determinate characteristic, each proposal demystifies Thomistic prime matter which one could otherwise charge with being so characterless as to slip into the ‘nothingness’ which terrified the Eleatics and motivated the introduction of prime matter in the first place.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,020

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prime matter and actuality.Christopher Byrne - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (2):197-224.
Prime Matter and Extension in Aristotle.Paul Studtmann - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:171-184.
Prime Matter and Barrington Jones.William H. Brenner - 1975 - Philosophy Research Archives 1:46-53.
The paradox of prime matter.Daniel W. Graham - 1987 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (4):475-490.
Prime Matter and Modern Physics.William M. R. Simpson - 2024 - Ancient Philosophy Today 6 (1):1-5.
Zabarella on Prime Matter and Extension.Berman Chan - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (5):2405-2422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-28

Downloads
5 (#1,760,330)

6 months
5 (#1,092,841)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex McQuibban
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A New Aristotle Reader.J. L. Ackrill (ed.) - 1987 - Clarendon Press.
The paradox of prime matter.Daniel W. Graham - 1987 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (4):475-490.
Ancient atomism.Sylvia Berryman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 references / Add more references