Preparedness, phobias, and the Panglossian paradigm

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):303-304 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his critique of preparedness theory, Davey does not address the limitations of adaptationism. The purpose of this commentary is to outline problems that arise when one assumes that mental illness (e.g., phobic disorder)musthave had adaptive significance for it to have survived the vicissitudes of natural selection.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
29 (#135,560)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The methodology of scientific research programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The consciousness of self.William James - 1890 - In The Principles of Psychology. London, England: Dover Publications.
The Study of Instinct.N. Tinbergen - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (17):72-76.

View all 24 references / Add more references