By Whose Authority: A Political Argument for God's Existence

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (2):163-189 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In The Problem of Political Authority, Michael Huemer argues that the contractarian and consequentialist groundings of political authority are unsuccessful, and, in fact, that there are no adequate contemporary accounts of political authority. As such, the modern state is illegitimate and we have reasons to affirm political anarchism. We disagree with Huemer’s conclusion. But we consider Huemer’s critiques of contractarianism and consequentialism to be compelling. Here we will juxtapose, alongside Huemer’s critiques, a theistic account of political authority from Nicholas Wolterstorff’s book The Mighty and the Almighty. We think that Wolterstorff’s model does better than contractarianism and consequentialism at answering Huemer’s critiques. We also think that an abductive basis for God’s existence emerges from the inadequate authority accounts that Huemer surveys.

Similar books and articles

Political Authority.John T. Sanders - 1983 - The Monist 66 (4):545-556.
Whately on Arguments Involving Authority.Hans V. Hansen - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):319-340.
Political legitimacy.Fabienne Peter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Political authority and obligation in Aristotle.Andrés Rosler - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

659 (#15,602)

6 months
94 (#14,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tyler McNabb
St. Francis University

Citations of this work

Nontraditional Arguments for Theism.Chad A. McIntosh - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):1-14.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references