Positive Organizational Outcomes Associated with a Penchant for Openness

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):799-812 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The tension between scientific openness versus secrecy has existed for centuries (Hull 1985). However, both academics and practitioners have recently argued that openness by private firms has many positive attributes. The purpose of this research effort is to review the extant literature on openness and to develop hypotheses regarding its impact on organizational outcomes. We then use a unique database to test the idea with 87 companies. Our findings are that openness is beneficial to the firm from a science, technological, and financial perspective and, perhaps, to the employees from an ethical viewpoint. The managerial and societal implications are also discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-18

Downloads
28 (#553,203)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The morality of scientific openness.Christian Munthe & Stellan Welin - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):411-428.
Openness and Secrecy in Science: Their Origins and Limitations.David Hull - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):4-12.
The essential nature of sharing in science.Michael J. Zigmond - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):783-799.

View all 8 references / Add more references