Darwin and the other Christian tradition

Zygon 46 (2):291-316 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract. Augustine, and following him some major theologians of the early Christian church, noted the apparent discrepancies between the first two chapters of Genesis and suggested an interpretation for these chapters significantly different from the literal. After examining a selection of the relevant texts, we shall follow the later fortunes of this interpretation in brief outline, figuring in particular an unlikely trio: Suarez, St. George Mivart, and Thomas Henry Huxley. Moral: Darwinian theory might plausibly be construed as implementing, unawares, a suggestion from that other Christian tradition

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mere History: The Place of Historical Studies in Theological Ethics.Jean Porter - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):103 - 126.
Augustine.Henry Chadwick - 1982 - In Richard Mervyn Hare, Jonathan Barnes & Henry Chadwick (eds.), Speculum. Oxford University Press. pp. 984-984.
Race and language in the Darwinian tradition (and what Darwin's language–species parallels have to do with it).Gregory Radick - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):359-370.
Augustine: a very short introduction.Henry Chadwick - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
"Et Quod Vis Fac": Paul Ramsey and Augustinian Ethics.Scott Davis - 1991 - Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):31 - 69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-10

Downloads
99 (#169,458)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?