Coercive offers and research participation: a comment on Wertheimer and Miller

Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (7):383-384 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Concepts such as ‘coercion’ and ‘inducement’ are often used within bioethics without much reflection upon what they mean. This is particularly so in research ethics where they are assumed to imply that payment for research participation is unethical. Wertheimer and Miller advance our thinking about these concepts and research ethics in a significant way, specifically by questioning the possibility of genuine offers ever being coercive. This commentary argues that they are right to question this assumption, however, more needs to be said about the plausible coercive offer cases and to explain the normativity of these cases

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Payment for Research Participation: A Coercive Offer?A. Wertheimer & F. G. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):389-392.
The Last Word on Coercive Offers …(?).Daniel Lyons - 1982 - Philosophy Research Archives 8:393-414.
The Right to Withdraw From Research.G. Owen Schaefer & Alan Wertheimer - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):329-352.
Is Law Coercive?Williams A. Edmundson - 1995 - Legal Theory 1 (1):81-111.
Welcome Threats and Coercive Offers.Daniel Lyons - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (194):425 - 436.
Coercive Wage Offers.David Zimmerman - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (2):121-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
21 (#536,153)

6 months
1 (#413,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?