Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl

Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):344-348 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that CSM should be illegal

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Exploitation and commercial surrogate motherhood.Hugh V. McLachlan & J. K. Swales - 2001 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7 (1):8--14.
Intentional Parenthood and the Nuclear Family.Liezl van Zyl - 2002 - Journal of Medical Humanities 23 (2):107-118.
In defence of agent-based virtue ethics.Liezl van Zyl - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (2):273-288.
Can virtuous people emerge from tragic dilemmas having acted well?Liezl van Zyl - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):50–61.
Undue Fear of Inducements in Research in Developing Countries.Gardar Arnason & Anton van Niekerk - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (2):122.
Agent-based Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Action Guidance.Liezl van Zyl - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (1):50-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
179 (#101,158)

6 months
8 (#157,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?