Some Remarks on the Mathematical Structure of the Multiverse

PhilSci-Archive, University of Pittsburgh, USA (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum entanglement experiments is at best incomplete, since the intermediate state induced by collapse of the wave function apparently depends upon the inertial rest frame in which the experiment is observed. While Everett’s Many Worlds Interpretation avoids the issue of wave function collapse, it, too, is a casualty of the special theory of relativity. This requires all events in the universe, past, present and future, to be unique, as in the block-universe picture, which rules out Everett-style branching. The benefits of MWI may be retained, however, by postulating a multiverse of discrete, parallel, block universes which are identical to each other up to certain points in the MWI “trunk” before they diverge according to the MWI branching. The quantum probability of an event then emerges from the number of parallel universes in which the event happens divided by the total number of universes. This means that the total number of such universes is finite. Such a picture is more easily envisaged by thinking of it as a purely mathematical structure, as in Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe Hypothesis. However, while Tegmark wished to avoid contamination from Gödelian self-referential knots, not only does such contamination appear to be inevitable, it brings an unexpected benefit. The mathematical hierarchy required by Gödel’s enigmatic footnote 48a leads to an explanation for a unitary evolution of deterministic quantum rules across the multiverse while accounting for quantum uncertainty within an individual universe. Other aspects of this structure, called here the Plexus, are discussed, including awareness of existence and other questions raised by the hypothesis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fine Tuning Explained? Multiverses and Cellular Automata.Francisco José Soler Gil & Manuel Alfonseca - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):153-172.
The Non-unique Universe.Gordon McCabe - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (6):629-637.
Against Multiverse Theodicies.Bradley Monton - 2010 - Philo 13 (2):113-135.
On Multiverses and Infinite Numbers.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2014 - In Klaas Kraay (ed.), God and the Multiverse. Routledge. pp. 162-173.
Possible Physical Universes.Gordon McCabe - 2005 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 37.
A note on the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics.Paul Benioff - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (9-10):709-720.
Discussion Following Michał Heller’s Lecture.Michał Heller - 2008 - Dialogue and Universalism 18 (9-10):150-153.
Quantum Mechanics, Spacetime Locality, and Gravity.Yasunori Nomura - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (8):978-1007.
The Mathematical Universe.Max Tegmark - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 38 (2):101-150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-27

Downloads
103 (#165,954)

6 months
18 (#135,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?