Prostitution and the Good of Sex: A Reply to Settegast

Social Theory and Practice 46 (4):765-784 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Sascha Settegast’s recently published article, “Prostitution and the Good of Sex” in Social Theory and Practice, he argues that prostitution is intrinsically harmful. In this article, I object to his argument, making the following three responses to his account: 1) bad sex is not “detrimental to the good life”; 2) bad sex is not necessarily unvirtuous; 3) sex work is work as well as sex, and so must be evaluated as work in addition to as sex.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-31

Downloads
509 (#59,739)

6 months
142 (#37,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Natasha McKeever
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Prostitution and the Good of Sex.Sascha Settegast - 2018 - Social Theory and Practice 44 (3):377-403.

Add more references