Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 12 (2):1-26 (2020)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
As academic literatures and political demands, global justice and populism look like competing ways of diagnosing and addressing neoliberal inequality. But both misunderstand neoliberalism and consequently risk reinforcing rather than undermining it. Neoliberalism does not just break down political and social hierarchies, but also relies on and sustains them. Unless populists recognize this, they will find that assertions of sovereignty do more to reinforce neoliberalism and reproduce its hierarchies than to resist them. Recognizing neoliberalism as not simply corrosive of solidarity but also producing its own affective ties suggests that global justice advocates need to develop a critique of individual attitudes that egalitarian liberals have often seen as private and been hesitant to judge. In short, if either populism or global justice hope to take advantage of neoliberalism’s failures to advance an egalitarian politics, they need to reckon more carefully with their own entanglement with neoliberalism’s hopes and hierarchies.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.21248/gjn.12.02.207 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Introduction.Miriam Ronzoni & Tiziana Torresi - 2020 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 12 (2):i-iv.
Similar books and articles
Disorienting Neoliberalism: Global Justice and the Outer Limit of Freedom.Benjamin L. McKean - 2020 - Oup Usa.
Transnational Populism, Democracy, and Representation: Pitfalls and Potentialities.Jonathan Kuyper & Benjamin Moffitt - 2020 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 12 (2):27-49.
Populism, Cosmopolitanism, or Democratic Realism?Christopher Meckstroth - 2020 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 12 (2):94-116.
‘Omnus Et Singulatim’: Establishing the Relationship Between Transitional Justice and Neoliberalism.Josh Bowsher - 2018 - Law and Critique 29 (1):83-106.
The Injustices of Global Justice Scholarship.Jonathan Havercroft - forthcoming - European Journal of Political Theory:147488512110006.
Populism and the Double Liberalism: Exploring the Links.Christian Joppke - forthcoming - Theory and Society.
Understanding the Rise of Populism Through the Crisis of Liberal Democracy, Neoliberalism and Globalization.Aykut Aykutalp - 2021 - Lyon, France: Livre de Lyon.
Global Justice, Positional Goods, and International Political Inequality.Chris Armstrong - 2013 - Ethics and Global Politics 6 (2):109-116.
Reforming Social Justice in Neoliberal Times.Janine M. Brodie - 2007 - Studies in Social Justice 1 (2):93-107.
Review of Global Justice Networks: Geographies of Transnational Solidarity. [REVIEW]Cemal Burak Tansel - 2013 - Studies in Social Justice 7 (1):161-163.
Global Economy, Global Justice: Theoretical Objections and Policy Alternatives to Neoliberalism.George DeMartino - 2000 - Routledge.
Global Justice and Global Relations.Kok-Chor Tan - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (3):499-514.
Neoliberalism Versus Distributional Autonomy: The Skipped Step in Rawls’s the Law of Peoples.William A. Edmundson & Matthew R. Schrepfer - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):169-181.
What Second-Best Scenarios Reveal About Ideals of Global Justice.Christian Barry & David Wiens - 2020 - In Thom Brooks (ed.), Oxford Handbook to Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
What Comes After Neoliberalism? Four Propositions for a New Law of Political Economy Beyond Structural Liberalism and Structural Marxism.Poul F. Kjaer - 2020 - What Comes After Neo-Liberalism?.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-04-24
Total views
9 ( #946,676 of 2,498,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,498,126 )
2021-04-24
Total views
9 ( #946,676 of 2,498,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,498,126 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads