Diodorus and Prior and the Master Argument

Synthese 42 (2):223 - 253 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On prior's reconstruction, The master argument of diodorus contains an equivocation and so is invalid for one class of diodorean "propositions." but diodorus knew of such "propositions" and an argument in his treatment of motion can be used to bring them under the master argument's sway. Also, Despite the consensus of antiquity, The master argument does not commit diodorus to determinism, Although it commits him to non-Deterministic theses which can be easily misinterpreted as deterministic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dialectical school.Susanne Bobzien - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Chrysippus’s response to Diodorus’s master argument.Harry A. Ide - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):133-148.
A version of the "master argument" of Diodorus.Nicholas Rescher - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (15):438-445.
Diodorus and the “master argument”.John Sutula - 1976 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):323-343.
Aristotle and the "Master Argument" of Diodorus.Jaakko Hintikka - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (2):101 - 114.
What Is the Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus?Frederick Seymour Michael - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (3):229 - 235.
Diodorus and modal logic: A correction.A. N. Prior - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (32):226-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#196,609)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Diodorus Cronus and the Logic of Time.Massie Pascal - 2016 - Review of Metaphysics 70 (2):279-309.
Chrysippe, les possibles et l’éternel retour.Olivier D’Jeranian - 2021 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 110 (2):191-208.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references