Review: William Lane Craig, God Over All: Divine Aseity and the Challenge of Platonism; God and Abstract Objects: The Coherence of Theism: Aseity [Book Review]

Philosophy in Review 39 (2):61-65 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God Over All: Divine Aseity and the Challenge of Platonism.William Lane Craig - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Craig’s Nominalism and the High Cost of Preserving Divine Aseity.R. Scott Smith - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (1):87--107.
Problems with the Bootstrapping Objection to Theistic Activism.Christopher Menzel - 2016 - American Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):55-68.
Nominalism and Divine Aseity.William Lane Craig & I. Theological Prolegomena - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 4 (1).
Critical Studies/Book Reviews.Simon Hewitt - forthcoming - Philosophia Mathematica:nky016.
Abstract objects? Who cares!Graham Oppy - 2014 - London UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
Physicalism and Classical Theism.Peter Forrest - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):179-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-18

Downloads
57 (#268,918)

6 months
13 (#161,691)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

C. A. McIntosh
Cornell University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references