Intentionality, pluralism, and redescription

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (4):493-505 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Donald Davidson, and others, have sometimes claimed that the subject matter of social science properly consists only of intentional actions. The author disputes this claim and explores an example drawn from social psychology that shows that some social scientific phenomena cannot be explained unless they are redescribed in nonintentional language. Key Words: intentionality • explanation • redescription • social science • Donald Davidson.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intentionality and Normativity.Uriah Kriegel - 2010 - Philosophical Issues 20 (1):185-208.
Redescription and Descriptivism in the Social Sciences.Lee C. McIntyre - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):453 - 464.
The ethics of rortian redescription.Brad Frazier - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):461-492.
Collective intentionality and the social sciences.Deborah Perron Tollefsen - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):25-50.
Intentionality and physical systems.Margaret A. Boden - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (2):200-214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#448,660)

6 months
5 (#565,734)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Explanation and understanding.Georg Henrik von Wright - 1971 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Mental Events.Donald Davidson - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references