Explanatory Power, Individualism and Neoclassical Economics: Comments on Kincaid

Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (S1):179-181 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1995, 2010

ISBN(s)

00384283

DOI

10.1111/j.2041-6962.1996.tb00819.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Explanatory Power, Individualism and Neoclassical Economics: Comments on Kincaid.Lee McIntyre - 1996 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (S1):179-181.
Can Neoclassical Economics Be Defended on Grounds of Explanatory Power?Harold Kincaid - 1996 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (S1):155-177.
Situational analysis beyond neoclassical economists.Lawrence A. Boland - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4):515-521.
Methodological individualism and explanation.Raimo Tuomela - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):133-140.
Models of man: Neoclassical, behavioural, and evolutionary.Dennis C. Mueller - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):59-76.
An Inquiry into the Explanatory Virtues of Transaction Cost Economics.Lukasz Hardt - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Economics 5 (1):120-147.
Individualism and the unity of science, Harold Kincaid. Rowman & Littlefield, 1997, VII + 165 pages. [REVIEW]Michael Bradie - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (1):147-174.
Individuals and institutions.Peter J. Boettke - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (1-2):10-26.
Some notes on methodological individualism: Orthodox and heterodox views.Andy Denis - manuscript
Further Problems with Neoclassical Environmental Economics.John M. Gowdy & Peg R. Olsen - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):161-171.
Frontiers of economics in the post-neoclassical era.Barkley Rosser - manuscript
Cliometrics, child labor, and the industrial revolution.Jane Humphries - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (3-4):269-283.
Why the acrimony? Reply to Davidson.Stephan Boehm & Karl Farmer - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):407-421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
34 (#456,993)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references