Doing away with double effect

Ethics 111 (2):219-255 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I will introduce six constraints that should guide the formulation and use of DE. One goal in listing them is to engage in dialectical fair play by ruling out criticisms of the doctrine that are directed at misformulations of DE or that result from misapplications of it. Each of these constraints should be acceptable to any proponent of DE. Yet when these constraints on the application of DE are respected, it becomes clear that many of the examples provided as illustrations of DE actually illustrate other, more interesting uses of the contrast between intention and foresight.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intentions, motives and the doctrine of double effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.
The double life of double effect.Allison McIntyre - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):61-74.
Doctrine of double effect.Alison McIntyre - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Four versions of double effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
238 (#67,999)

6 months
13 (#101,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alison McIntyre
Wellesley College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references