Commentary on Steven A. Long’s The Teleological Grammar of the Moral Act

Nova et Vetera 8:207-213 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary on Long.Steven K. Strange - 1988 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 4 (1):102-112.
The givenness of grammar: A reply to Steven affeltd.Steven Mulhall - 1998 - European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):32–44.
Moral reasoning for journalists: cases and commentary.Steven R. Knowlton - 1997 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger. Edited by Bill Reader.
How good is the linguistic analogy?Susan Dwyer - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 145--167.
Wholes that cause their parts: Organic self-reproduction and the reality of biological teleology.Thomas Teufel - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):252-260.
The teleological/deontological distinction.Peter Vallentyne - 1987 - Journal of Value Inquiry 21 (1):21-32.
Logic, form, and grammar.Peter Long - 2001 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel McInerny
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references