Topoi:1-15 (forthcoming)

Authors
Jakub Mácha
Masaryk University
Abstract
Both Hegel and the later Wittgenstein were concerned with the problem of how to begin speculation, or the problem of beginning. I argue that despite many differences, there are surprising similarities between their thinking about the beginning. They both consider different kinds of beginnings and combine them into complex analogies. The beginning has a subjective and an objective moment. The philosophizing subject has to begin with something, with an object. For Hegel, the objective moment is pure being. For Wittgenstein, the objective moment is something that cannot be doubted. As regards the subjective moment, the philosophizing subject has to decide, without any reason, to conclude her quest for the presuppositionless beginning and finally begin at the beginning. The arational moment of this decision is echoed throughout any rational thought. Any application of a rule is, ultimately, a blind decision to apply this rule.
Keywords Hegel  Wittgenstein  Beginning  Resolve  Doubt  Pure being
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11245-022-09797-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Certainty (Ed. Anscombe and von Wright).Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1969 - New York and London: Harper Torchbooks.
On What Grounds What.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
Philosophical Remarks.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1975 - Oxford, England: University of Chicago Press.
Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing.Duncan Pritchard - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (3):70-90.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hegel and the Problem of Beginning.Robb Dunphy - 2021 - Hegel Bulletin 42 (3):344-367.
Introduction: Hegel, Wittgenstein, Identity, Difference.Jakub Mácha - 2019 - In Jakub Mácha & Alexander Berg (eds.), Wittgenstein and Hegel: Reevaluation of Difference. Berlín, Německo: pp. 1-21.
Hegel's Logic as Presuppositionless Science.Miles Hentrup - 2019 - Idealistic Studies 49 (2):145-165.
«¿ Cuál debe ser el comienzo de la ciencia?» El problema del comienzo en Hegel.Nicolás García Mills - 2012 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 29 (1):189-215.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-05-14

Total views
84 ( #141,587 of 2,533,648 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
84 ( #8,620 of 2,533,648 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes