Silent Reading and Conceptual Confusion

Journal of Philosophical Research 38:323-332 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Silent reading is markedly different from loud reading. For loud reading it is necessary that the spoken words match the printed or written words in accord with rules of pronunciation and grammar. Ordinarily, a loud reader can repeat or describe what he has read, but the acquisition of this ability is not necessary for loud reading. However, for silent reading it is necessary that the reader can repeat or describe the printed or written words that he has read. Inner voicing may be part of the experience of silent reading, but it isn’t necessary.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Silent Reading and Conceptual Confusion.James McGray - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:323-332.
Utopia: Reading and Redemption.Silvana Rabinovich - 2006 - Diogenes 53 (1):109-116.
A Case Study On How To Improve Chinese Learners' Reading Ability.Yan Gao - 2010 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:134-140.
A study of the eye-movements of stutterers during oral reading.H. H. Jasper & E. Murray - 1932 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 15 (5):528.
Conjecturing Up Spirits in the Improvisations of Mediums.Claus Flodin Larsen - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 585-614.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references