Me and My Body: The Relevance of the Distinction for the Difference between Withdrawing Life Support and Euthanasia

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):671-677 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, I discuss David Shaw's claim that the body of a terminally ill person can be conceived as a kind of life support, akin to an artificial ventilator. I claim that this position rests upon an untenable dualism between the mind and the body. Given that dualism continues to be attractive to some thinkers, I attempt to diagnose the reasons why it continues to be attractive, as well as to demonstrate its incoherence, drawing on some recent work in the philosophy of psychology. I conclude that, if my criticisms are sound, Shaw's attempt to deny the distinction between withdrawal and euthanasia fails



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mind-Body Dualism.Dean Zimmerman & Penelope Mackie - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (2pt2):181 - 199.
On acts, omissions and responsibility.J. Coggon - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):576-579.
Cartesian Dualism and the Union of Mind and Body.Zuraya Monroy-Nasr - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:122-127.
In defence of infringement.Andrew Botterell - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (3):269-292.


Added to PP

59 (#269,240)

6 months
3 (#1,257,776)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?