Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False, by Thomas Nagel

Mind 122 (486):fzt059 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/fzt059

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Thomas Nagel: Mind and Cosmos. [REVIEW]Logan Paul Gage - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (3):588-560.
Review of “Mind and Cosmos” by Thomas Nagel. [REVIEW]Kristina Musholt - 2013 - Science 339 (6125):1277.
An untutored reaction of incredulity: A Review of Thomas Nagel's Mind and Cosmos.Mohan Matthen - 2013 - Philosophers' Magazine 60 (-1):114 - 117.
Other minds: critical essays, 1969-1994.Thomas Nagel - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Rethinking Nagel.Shaffarullah Abdul Rahman - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:189-197.
Husserl and Nagel on subjectivity and the limits of physical objectivity.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2002 - Continental Philosophy Review 35 (4):353-377.
Nagasawa vs. Nagel: Omnipotence, Pseudo‐Tasks, and a Recent Discussion of Nagel's Doubts About Physicalism1.Michael Gorman - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (5):436 – 447.
An institutional political economy view on Thomas Nagel's 'minimum humanitarian morality' in global justice.Yasushi Suzuki - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (2-3):169-178.
Equality and Partiality.Thomas Nagel - 1991 - New York, US: OUP Usa. Edited by Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-18

Downloads
856 (#16,576)

6 months
77 (#56,454)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references