Looks and Perceptual Justification

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1):110-133 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Imagine I hold up a Granny Smith apple for all to see. You would thereby gain justified beliefs that it was green, that it was apple, and that it is a Granny Smith apple. Under classical foundationalism, such simple visual beliefs are mediately justified on the basis of reasons concerning your experience. Under dogmatism, some or all of these beliefs are justified immediately by your experience and not by reasons you possess. This paper argues for what I call the looks view of the justification of simple visual beliefs. According to the looks view, such beliefs are mediately justified on the basis of reasons concerning how the relevant things look. Unlike under classical foundationalism, under the looks view as I develop it, these reasons are public. They are public with respect to both their content and possession: with respect to content, they are not about ourselves and our experiences, and with respect to their possession, many people can have the very same looks-related reasons.

Similar books and articles

How to Be a Reasonable Dogmatist.James Vincent Pryor - 1997 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Stick to what you know.Jonathan Sutton - 2005 - Noûs 39 (3):359–396.
Schellenberg on the epistemic force of experience.Matthew McGrath - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):897-905.
The role of coherence in epistemic justification.T. Shogenji - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):90 – 106.
Liberal Fundamentalism and Its Rivals.Peter Graham - 2006 - In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 93-115.
The basis of justification.Ruth Weintraub - 1994 - Philosophical Papers 23 (1):19-29.
Scientific Realism, Perceptual Beliefs, and Justification.Richard Otte - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:393 - 404.
On Having Reasons for Perceptual Beliefs: A Sellarsian Perspective.Dan D. Crawford - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:107-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-02

Downloads
560 (#30,730)

6 months
114 (#31,873)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew McGrath
Washington University in St. Louis

Citations of this work

Epistemic Reasons I: Normativity.Kurt Sylvan - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (7):364-376.
Experience, Seemings, and Evidence.Indrek Reiland - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (4):510-534.
A Metacognitive Account of Phenomenal Force.Lu Teng - 2023 - Mind and Language 38 (4):1081-1101.
The Epistemic Insignificance of Phenomenal Force.Lu Teng - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Perceptual reasons.Juan Comesana & Matthew McGrath - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):991-1006.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge in an uncertain world.Jeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthew McGrath.
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.
The skeptic and the dogmatist.James Pryor - 2000 - Noûs 34 (4):517–549.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.

View all 29 references / Add more references