Explaining the evolutionary significance of intellectual play: Are we barking up the wrong tree?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):166-167 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00011079

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

‘Barking up the wrong tree’: rationaliteit in de religieuze beslisboom.G. J. De Ridder - unknown
'Barking up the wrong tree': rationaliteit in de religieuze beslisboom.Jeroen de Ridder - 2012 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 104 (2):112.
The tree of life: introduction to an evolutionary debate. [REVIEW]Maureen A. O’Malley, William Martin & John Dupré - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):441-453.
The structure and significance of evolutionary explanations in philosophy.Bence Nanay - 2004 - In H. Carel & D. Gamez (eds.), What Philosophy is. Ccontinuum.
Play, dreams, and simulation.J. A. Cheyne - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):918-919.
Trashing life’s tree.L. R. Franklin-Hall - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):689-709.
Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history.Robert J. O'Hara - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2): 135–160.
The evolution of testimony: Receiver vigilance, speaker honesty and the reliability of communication.Kourken Michaelian - 2013 - Episteme 10 (1):37-59.
What is the 'Cause' in Causal Decision Theory?Christopher Hitchcock - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (1):129-146.
Playing for keeps.Kerrie P. Lewis & Robert A. Barton - 2004 - Human Nature 15 (1):5-21.
Transcending Darwinism Thinking Laterally on the Tree of Life.Jan Sapp - 2009 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 31 (2):161 - 181.
Ernst Mayr, the tree of life, and philosophy of biology.Maureen A. O’Malley - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):529-552.
Definition 1.1. 1. A tree is a subset T of< such that for all∈ T, if∈< and⊆, then∈ T. 2. If T is a tree and S⊆ T is also a tree, we say that S is a subtree of T. 3. A tree T is bounded if there exists h:→ such that for all∈ T. [REVIEW]Joseph R. Mileti - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (3).
The ontogeny and phylogeny of children’s object and fantasy play.A. D. Pellegrini & David F. Bjorklund - 2004 - Human Nature 15 (1):23-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
19 (#778,470)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Ontogeny and Phylogeny.Stephen Jay Gould - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):652-653.
The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1976 - Journal of the History of Biology 9 (2):324-324.

View all 23 references / Add more references