American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):60-64 (2001)

Authors
Arthur L. Caplan
New York University
Abstract
Conceived as a solution to clinical dilemmas, and now required by organizations for hospital accreditation, ethics committees have been subject only to small-scale studies. The wide use of ethics committees and the diverse roles they play compel study. In 1999 the University of Pennsylvania Ethics Committee Research Group (ECRG) completed the first national survey of the presence, composition, and activities of U.S. healthcare ethics committees (HECs). Ethics committees are relatively young, on average seven years in operation. Eighty-six percent of ethics committees report that they play a role in ongoing clinical decision making through clinical ethics consultation. All are engaged in developing institutional clinical policy. Although 4.5% of HECs write policy on managed care, 50% of HEC chairs feel inadequately prepared to address managed care. The power and activity of ethics committees parallels the composition of those committees and the relationship of members to their institutions. The role of ethics committees across the nation in making policies about clinical care is greater than was known, and ethics committees will likely continue to play an important role in the debate and resolution of clinical cases and clinical policies
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/152651601317139531
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Status of Hospital Ethics Committees in Pennsylvania.Ellen L. Csikai - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (1):104-107.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Role of Empirical Research in Bioethics.Alexander A. Kon - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):59-65.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate.Lonneke M. Poort - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.
Ethics Committees for "High Tech" Innovations in Japan.Rihito Kimura - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):457-464.
Bioethics and Ethics Committees in Italy. The Present Situation and the Perspectives.Paolo Cattorini - 1993 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 1 (1):129-136.
The Ghana Experience.Paulina Tindana & Okyere Boateng - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (4):277-281.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-11

Total views
57 ( #199,371 of 2,504,875 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,875 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes