The Responsibility Objection to Abortion: Rejecting the Notion that the Responsibility Objection Successfully Refutes a Woman's Right to Choose

Bioethics 29 (4):291-299 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers the objection to abortion that a woman who voluntarily engages in sexual activity is responsible for her fetus and so cannot have an abortion. The conclusion argued for is that the conceptions of responsibility that can ground the objection that are considered do not necessitate a requirement on the part of a pregnant woman to carry her pregnancy to term. Thus, the iterations of the responsibility objection presented cannot be used to curtail reproductive choice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nudging the responsibility objection.Gerald Lang - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1):56–71.
Abortion: Models of responsibility. [REVIEW]Ann Garry - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (3):371 - 396.
Abortion and conscientious objection.Daniel J. Hill - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):344-350.
Victorian Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008.Marcia Riordan - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (2):7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-11

Downloads
172 (#108,618)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Defense of Abortion.David Boonin - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references