Schopenhauer as Epistemologist: A Kantian against Kant

International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):209-229 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An examination of Schopenhauer’s epistemology can considerably enhance our appreciation of his philosophical achievement in at least three major ways: First, by shedding light on the unity and internal coherence of his system ; second, by clearly revealing some of his fundamental disagreements with Kant; and, finally, by making it plain that he is less removed from the mainstream epistemology-centred tradition of modern philosophy than some have supposed. To make good on these claims, I address three questions about his epistemology: Does Schopenhauer accept a foundationalist theory of epistemic justification? On what grounds does he reject skepticism concerning our knowledge of the external world? and In what does he think the true philosophical significance of skepticism consists?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schopenhauer's Metaphysics of the Will.Gilbert L. Shepard - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Schopenhauer, Kant and Compassion.Paul Guyer - 2012 - Kantian Review 17 (3):403-429.
Self and world in Schopenhauer's philosophy.Christopher Janaway - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Schopenhauer's Critique of Kantian Ethics.Julian Young - 1984 - Kant Studien 75 (1-4):191-212.
Narcissistic Epistemology.Stephen Cade Hetherington - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
57 (#275,739)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas McDermid
Trent University

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2002.Margit Ruffing - 2004 - Kant Studien 95 (4):505-538.
The world as representation: Schopenhauer's arguments for transcendental idealism.Douglas James McDermid - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):57 – 87.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references