Intrinsic versus contingent claims about the harmfulness of prostitution

Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):83-83 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Moen targets a view about the intrinsic harmfulness of prostitution that he sees as widespread in healthcare, academia and public policy.1 He argues that the exchange of sex for money is not intrinsically harmful by systematically rejecting various possible proposed harms. He further suggests that it is the social context of discriminating laws and stigma that accounts for the harms experienced by prostitutes, rather than any intrinsic feature of exchanging sex for money.One striking aspect of his argument is the particular way in which he characterises the common view about the harmfulness of prostitution. Consider the following two possible versions of the claim that prostitution is harmful: "The intrinsic claim: The exchange of sex for money is intrinsically harmful to the seller." "The contingent claim: Prostitutes are currently likely to experience significant harm."The intrinsic claim is …



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,724

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

46 (#266,301)

6 months
1 (#479,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Is prostitution harmful?Ole Martin Moen - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):73-81.

Add more references