History and Theory 26 (4):30-46 (1987)

Abstract
Recent studies of historical synthesis have denied the possibility of "truth" in historical narratives, which they state impose meaning on a series of events. An historian is, however, capable of writing a true history, true in the sense that his or her narrative provides a fair representation of its central subject. Descriptions represent the world when they give us an idea that resembles part of the world itself. A subject can be said to be fairly represented if an author follows certain procedures: events must be presented chronologically; the main changes that occurred in the subject must be described; there must not be descriptions or omissions which might give a misleading impression of the subject; and the subject should be explained at a consistent level of generality and with a consistent level of detail. An historian motivated by preconceptions rather than the desire to represent a subject fairly, will not write a true history. Preconceptions are not incompatible with writing true histories, however, as long as they are discarded when an historian learns that they are incompatible with a fair representation. Analysis can be supplementary to, but is never a substitute for, accurate historical representation of a subject
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2505043
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction.Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale - 2000 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (1):109-125.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Structure and Objectivity of Historical Narratives.C. Behan Mccullagh - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:145-158.
Truth in Interpretation: The Case of Psychoanalysis.Paul A. Roth - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (2):175-195.
Science as (Historical) Narrative.M. Norton Wise - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (3):349-376.
The Unifying Themes of Historical Narratives.C. Behan Mccullagh - 1989 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (1):55-74.
Narratives of Space, Time, and Life.Barbara Tversky - 2004 - Mind and Language 19 (4):380–392.
The Truth About Conquest: Joshua as History, Narrative, and Scripture.L. Daniel Hawk - 2012 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 66 (2):129-140.
I Felt so Tall Within: Anthroplogy in Slave Narratives.Paul Richard Blum - 2013 - Annals of Cultural Studies (Roczniki Kulturoznawcze) 4 (2):21-39.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-04-06

Total views
41 ( #278,868 of 2,520,967 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,967 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes